Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (2.78 vs 0.61, Δ 2.17).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 2.78Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.61 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 89% | Pass accuracy | 89% |
| 449 | Accurate passes | 474Lead |
| 507 | Total passes | 534Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.08 | Goals prevented | -0.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.