Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (1.38 vs 1.19, Δ 0.19).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (18 vs 13 shots).
- Stromsgodset was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 28%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 1.38Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.19 |
| Offsides | ||
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 538Lead | Accurate passes | 231 |
| 631Lead | Total passes | 321 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |