Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (2.52 vs 1.46, Δ 1.06).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- Tottenham was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 2.52Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.46 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 440Lead | Accurate passes | 399 |
| 505Lead | Total passes | 460 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.79 | Goals prevented | -0.79 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.