Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (2.62 vs 1.00, Δ 1.62).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 2.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 88% |
| 493Lead | Accurate passes | 416 |
| 556Lead | Total passes | 473 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |