Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (3.52 vs 0.64, Δ 2.88).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (19 vs 3 shots).
- Tromso was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 53%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 3.52Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.64 |
| Offsides | ||
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 652Lead | Accurate passes | 250 |
| 723Lead | Total passes | 318 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -1.14 | Goals prevented | -1.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |