Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (4.33 vs 0.49, Δ 3.84).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (23 vs 5 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 4.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.49 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 618Lead | Accurate passes | 309 |
| 690Lead | Total passes | 383 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |