Match statistics snapshot
- CA River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
- Boston River held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Boston River | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Boston River | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Boston River | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Boston River | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Boston River | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |