Match statistics snapshot
- Boston River created the clearer chances on xG (1.90 vs 0.15, Δ 1.75).
- Boston River fired more attempts (15 vs 3 shots).
- Boston River was more accurate in front of goal (13% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Boston River | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.90Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.15 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Boston River | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 233 | Accurate passes | 331Lead |
| 306 | Total passes | 414Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Boston River | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Boston River | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| -0.14 | Goals prevented | -0.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Boston River | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.