Match statistics snapshot
- O'Higgins created the clearer chances on xG (1.40 vs 1.57, Δ 0.17).
- O'Higgins fired more attempts (17 vs 15 shots).
- Boston River was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Boston River | Statistic | O'higgins |
|---|---|---|
| 1.40 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.57Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Boston River | Statistic | O'higgins |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 274 | Accurate passes | 303Lead |
| 337 | Total passes | 372Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Boston River | Statistic | O'higgins |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Boston River | Statistic | O'higgins |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.93 | Goals prevented | -0.93 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Boston River | Statistic | O'higgins |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.