Match statistics snapshot
- Boston River created the clearer chances on xG (0.72 vs 0.68, Δ 0.04).
- Racing Montevideo fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- Boston River was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 6%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Boston River | Statistic | Racing Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.72Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Boston River | Statistic | Racing Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 68%Lead |
| 168 | Accurate passes | 237Lead |
| 265 | Total passes | 351Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Boston River | Statistic | Racing Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Boston River | Statistic | Racing Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.18 | Goals prevented | 0.18 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Boston River | Statistic | Racing Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.