Match statistics snapshot
- Sao Paulo created the clearer chances on xG (0.33 vs 0.94, Δ 0.61).
- Sao Paulo was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 9%).
- Sao Paulo held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Boston River | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.33 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Boston River | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 158 | Accurate passes | 472Lead |
| 225 | Total passes | 553Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Boston River | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Boston River | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.04 | Goals prevented | 0.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Boston River | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.