Match statistics snapshot
- Remo fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Botafogo SP was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 19%).
- Remo held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Botafogo Sp | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 |
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Botafogo Sp | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 163 | Accurate passes | 403Lead |
| 236 | Total passes | 472Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Botafogo Sp | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Botafogo Sp | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Botafogo Sp | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |