Match statistics snapshot
- Botafogo created the clearer chances on xG (2.63 vs 0.28, Δ 2.35).
- Botafogo fired more attempts (25 vs 6 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 28%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Botafogo | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 2.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.28 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Botafogo | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 74%Lead | Ball possession | 26% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 601Lead | Accurate passes | 172 |
| 687Lead | Total passes | 247 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Botafogo | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Botafogo | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 2.08 | Goals prevented | 2.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Botafogo | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.