Match statistics snapshot
- Botev Vratsa created the clearer chances on xG (1.83 vs 0.61, Δ 1.22).
- Hebar 1918 fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Botev Vratsa was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Botev Vratsa | Statistic | Hebar 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.83Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.61 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Botev Vratsa | Statistic | Hebar 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 149 | Accurate passes | 348Lead |
| 204 | Total passes | 431Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Botev Vratsa | Statistic | Hebar 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Botev Vratsa | Statistic | Hebar 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Botev Vratsa | Statistic | Hebar 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.