Match statistics snapshot
- Botev Vratsa created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 0.39, Δ 0.81).
- Botev Vratsa fired more attempts (11 vs 5 shots).
- Hebar 1918 was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 45%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Botev Vratsa | Statistic | Hebar 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.39 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Botev Vratsa | Statistic | Hebar 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 160 | Accurate passes | 263Lead |
| 224 | Total passes | 346Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Botev Vratsa | Statistic | Hebar 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Botev Vratsa | Statistic | Hebar 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Botev Vratsa | Statistic | Hebar 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.