Match statistics snapshot
- Brann created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 0.81, Δ 0.41).
- Brann fired more attempts (9 vs 5 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Brann | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Brann | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 58% |
| 370Lead | Accurate passes | 183 |
| 505Lead | Total passes | 314 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Brann | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Brann | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Brann | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |