Match statistics snapshot
- Brisbane Roar fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Melbourne Victory was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 24%).
- Brisbane Roar held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Brisbane Roar | Statistic | Melbourne Victory |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Brisbane Roar | Statistic | Melbourne Victory |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 547Lead | Accurate passes | 243 |
| 651Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Brisbane Roar | Statistic | Melbourne Victory |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Brisbane Roar | Statistic | Melbourne Victory |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Brisbane Roar | Statistic | Melbourne Victory |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.