Match statistics snapshot
- Bristol City fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bristol City | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead |
| 4 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bristol City | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 445 | Accurate passes | 451Lead |
| 512 | Total passes | 526Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bristol City | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bristol City | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bristol City | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.