Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (0.60 vs 0.90, Δ 0.30).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 18%).
- Bristol City held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bristol City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 0.60 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.90Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bristol City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 525Lead | Accurate passes | 364 |
| 619Lead | Total passes | 451 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bristol City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bristol City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bristol City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |