Match statistics snapshot
- Bristol Rovers created the clearer chances on xG (1.07 vs 0.30, Δ 0.77).
- Cheltenham fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Bristol Rovers was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bristol Rovers | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.07Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.30 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bristol Rovers | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 57% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 127 | Accurate passes | 300Lead |
| 222 | Total passes | 382Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bristol Rovers | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bristol Rovers | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bristol Rovers | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.