Match statistics snapshot
- Bromley fired more attempts (20 vs 3 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 25%).
- Bromley held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bromley | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bromley | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 66%Lead | Pass accuracy | 55% |
| 248Lead | Accurate passes | 171 |
| 376Lead | Total passes | 313 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bromley | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bromley | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bromley | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |