Match statistics snapshot
- Bromley created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 0.64, Δ 0.42).
- Barnet fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Bromley was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bromley | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.64 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bromley | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 57% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 147 | Accurate passes | 354Lead |
| 256 | Total passes | 443Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bromley | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bromley | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bromley | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |