Match statistics snapshot
- Bromley fired more attempts (17 vs 16 shots).
- Cheltenham was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bromley | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 8 | Shots off target |
| 9Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bromley | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 55% | Pass accuracy | 65%Lead |
| 178 | Accurate passes | 222Lead |
| 324 | Total passes | 343Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bromley | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bromley | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bromley | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.