Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 20%).
- Reading held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bromley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
| 15 | Total shots | 16Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bromley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 173 | Accurate passes | 286Lead |
| 267 | Total passes | 366Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bromley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bromley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bromley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |