Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 2.86, Δ 2.06).
- Hammarby fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Hammarby was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Brommapojkarna W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.86Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Brommapojkarna W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 223 | Accurate passes | 407Lead |
| 320 | Total passes | 515Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Brommapojkarna W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Brommapojkarna W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Brommapojkarna W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |