Match statistics snapshot
- Brondby created the clearer chances on xG (1.12 vs 0.87, Δ 0.25).
- Brondby fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- FC Copenhagen was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Brondby | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.87 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Brondby | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 420Lead | Accurate passes | 322 |
| 488Lead | Total passes | 379 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Brondby | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Brondby | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Brondby | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.