Match statistics snapshot
- Brondby fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Viborg was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 29%).
- Brondby held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 478Lead | Accurate passes | 331 |
| 556Lead | Total passes | 397 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |