Match statistics snapshot
- Brondby created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 0.33, Δ 0.76).
- Brondby fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Brondby was more accurate in front of goal (15% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.33 |
| Offsides | ||
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 378Lead | Accurate passes | 267 |
| 466Lead | Total passes | 353 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |