Match statistics snapshot
- Brondby created the clearer chances on xG (2.38 vs 1.23, Δ 1.15).
- Viborg fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Brondby was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2.38Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.23 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 485Lead | Accurate passes | 370 |
| 549Lead | Total passes | 430 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Brondby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |