Match statistics snapshot
- Bryne created the clearer chances on xG (0.78 vs 0.48, Δ 0.30).
- KFUM Oslo held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bryne | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.78Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.48 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 2Lead | Shots off target |
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bryne | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 342 | Accurate passes | 441Lead |
| 451 | Total passes | 551Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bryne | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bryne | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bryne | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |