Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Buriram United was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 27%).
- Hangzhou Greentown held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Buriram United | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Buriram United | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 189 | Accurate passes | 367Lead |
| 257 | Total passes | 424Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Buriram United | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Buriram United | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Buriram United | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |