Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (0.76 vs 1.86, Δ 1.10).
- Burnley fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Burnley | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 0.76 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.86Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Burnley | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 328 | Accurate passes | 613Lead |
| 390 | Total passes | 664Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Burnley | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Burnley | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Burnley | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.