Match statistics snapshot
- Burnley created the clearer chances on xG (0.95 vs 0.59, Δ 0.36).
- Burnley fired more attempts (11 vs 3 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Burnley | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 1Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Burnley | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 474Lead | Accurate passes | 309 |
| 567Lead | Total passes | 417 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Burnley | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Burnley | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.46 | Goals prevented | 0.46 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Burnley | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |