Match statistics snapshot
- Burnley created the clearer chances on xG (2.82 vs 0.63, Δ 2.19).
- Burnley fired more attempts (22 vs 8 shots).
- Mansfield Town was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Burnley | Statistic | Mansfield Town |
|---|---|---|
2.82Lead | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 0.63 |
4 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 0Lead |
17Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
8Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
22Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 8 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Burnley | Statistic | Mansfield Town |
|---|---|---|
64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
464Lead | Accurate passes | 211 |
551Lead | Total passes | 297 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Burnley | Statistic | Mansfield Town |
|---|---|---|
9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Burnley | Statistic | Mansfield Town |
|---|---|---|
10Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 2 |
1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Burnley | Statistic | Mansfield Town |
|---|---|---|
14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Burnley leads this block
Mansfield Town leads shot accuracy (+106% vs Burnley)
Mansfield Town leads shot accuracy (+106% vs Burnley)
Burnley leads shot quality (+63% vs Mansfield Town)
Burnley leads box penetration (+55% vs Mansfield Town)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Burnley leads this block
Burnley leads possession efficiency (+152% vs Mansfield Town)
Burnley leads possession efficiency (+152% vs Mansfield Town)
Mansfield Town — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Burnley leads this block
Burnley leads territorial pressure (+307% vs Mansfield Town)
Burnley leads territorial pressure (+307% vs Mansfield Town)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Burnley — stronger shot quality allowed
Burnley — stronger shot quality allowed
Mansfield Town leads keeper workload (+49% vs Burnley)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Burnley leads this block
Burnley had the edge in 6 of 6 signals in this block.
Burnley leads (22.0 vs 17.0).
Burnley leads (53.8 vs 25.6).
Burnley leads (26.0 vs 5.0).
Burnley leads (0.128 vs 0.079).
Burnley leads (92.1 vs 87.2).
Burnley leads (28.0 vs 17.0).