Match statistics snapshot
- Burnley created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 0.08, Δ 1.12).
- Burnley fired more attempts (22 vs 2 shots).
- Burnley was more accurate in front of goal (18% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Burnley | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.08 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
| 22Lead | Total shots | 2 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Burnley | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 623Lead | Accurate passes | 177 |
| 698Lead | Total passes | 242 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Burnley | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Burnley | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.44 | Goals prevented | 0.44 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Burnley | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |