Match statistics snapshot
- Burnley created the clearer chances on xG (1.26 vs 0.90, Δ 0.36).
- Burnley was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Burnley | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.90 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Burnley | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 409Lead | Accurate passes | 359 |
| 496Lead | Total passes | 473 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Burnley | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Burnley | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Burnley | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |