Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 2.05, Δ 0.99).
- Burnley was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
- Burnley held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Burnley | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.05Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Burnley | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 488Lead | Accurate passes | 164 |
| 558Lead | Total passes | 223 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Burnley | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Burnley | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 0.29 | Goals prevented | 0.29 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Burnley | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |