Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Burton Albion was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
- Reading held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 6 | Offsides | 4Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 4 |
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 30% | Ball possession | 70%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 166 | Accurate passes | 517Lead |
| 238 | Total passes | 578Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |