Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
3 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 1Lead |
8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
4 | Shots off target | 4 |
3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
11 | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 13Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
55% | Pass accuracy | 57%Lead |
180 | Accurate passes | 199Lead |
328 | Total passes | 347Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
4 | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 5Lead |
4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
12 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Burton Albion leads box penetration (+18% vs Rotherham)
Rotherham leads (31% vs 27%).
Burton Albion leads box penetration (+18% vs Rotherham)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Rotherham leads this block
Burton Albion — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Burton Albion — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Burton Albion leads this block
Burton Albion leads territorial pressure (+18% vs Rotherham)
Burton Albion leads territorial pressure (+18% vs Rotherham)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Burton Albion leads this block
Burton Albion had the edge in 3 of 4 signals in this block.
Burton Albion leads (14.0 vs 11.0).
Rotherham leads (29.1 vs 26.9).
Burton Albion leads (18.0 vs 11.0).
Burton Albion leads (17.0 vs 14.0).