Match statistics snapshot
- West Ham created the clearer chances on xG (1.85 vs 2.19, Δ 0.34).
- Burton Albion fired more attempts (19 vs 18 shots).
- West Ham was more accurate in front of goal (28% on target vs 16%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
1.85 | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 2.19Lead |
4 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 4 |
12 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
7Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
19Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 18 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
65% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
246 | Accurate passes | 537Lead |
376 | Total passes | 641Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
7 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
9 | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 9 |
4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Burton Albion | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
West Ham leads this block
West Ham leads shot accuracy (+76% vs Burton Albion)
West Ham leads shot accuracy (+76% vs Burton Albion)
West Ham leads shot quality (+25% vs Burton Albion)
West Ham leads box penetration (+23% vs Burton Albion)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Burton Albion leads this block
Burton Albion leads possession efficiency (+38% vs West Ham)
Burton Albion leads possession efficiency (+38% vs West Ham)
West Ham — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
West Ham leads this block
West Ham leads territorial pressure (+26% vs Burton Albion)
West Ham leads territorial pressure (+26% vs Burton Albion)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
West Ham leads this block
West Ham — stronger shot quality allowed
West Ham — stronger shot quality allowed
West Ham leads keeper workload (+69% vs Burton Albion)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
West Ham leads this block
West Ham had the edge in 6 of 6 signals in this block.
West Ham leads (21.0 vs 12.0).
West Ham leads (52.1 vs 24.7).
West Ham leads (26.0 vs 19.0).
West Ham leads (0.122 vs 0.097).
West Ham leads (90.3 vs 87.8).
West Ham leads (27.0 vs 19.0).