Match statistics snapshot
- Danubio fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Danubio was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 44%).
- CA River Plate held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |