Match statistics snapshot
- Danubio fired more attempts (9 vs 5 shots).
- Danubio was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 3 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target |
| 5Lead |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| Goalkeeper saves |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |