Match statistics snapshot
- CA River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 1 | Shots off target | 2Lead |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| Ball possession | ||
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| Goalkeeper saves |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |