Match statistics snapshot
- Danubio fired more attempts (7 vs 4 shots).
- CA River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| Shots inside the box | ||
| Shots off target |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 7Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| Ball possession | ||
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Danubio |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |