Match statistics snapshot
- Fenix fired more attempts (8 vs 6 shots).
- CA River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
- Fenix held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Fenix |
|---|---|---|
| Offsides | ||
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 3 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 3Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Fenix |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Fenix |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Fenix |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Fenix |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |