Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool Montevideo fired more attempts (20 vs 10 shots).
- CA River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 20%).
- Liverpool Montevideo held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Liverpool Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 11Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Liverpool Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 187 | Accurate passes | 318Lead |
| 275 | Total passes | 403Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Liverpool Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Liverpool Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Liverpool Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |