Match statistics snapshot
- Penarol fired more attempts (21 vs 7 shots).
- Penarol was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 29%).
- CA River Plate held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Penarol |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Penarol |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 342Lead | Accurate passes | 267 |
| 440Lead | Total passes | 355 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Penarol |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Penarol |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Penarol |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |