Match statistics snapshot
- CA River Plate fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Wanderers was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 23%).
- CA River Plate held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ca River Plate | Statistic | Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |