Match statistics snapshot
- Caen fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Quevilly was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 31%).
- Caen held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Caen | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Caen | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 492Lead | Accurate passes | 181 |
| 594Lead | Total passes | 267 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Caen | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Caen | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Caen | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |