Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 1.53, Δ 0.72).
- Como fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Cagliari was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.53Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 272 | Accurate passes | 333Lead |
| 362 | Total passes | 422Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.39 | Goals prevented | 0.39 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cagliari | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |